As with community and technical colleges, universities are under the gun to improve their graduation rates. They also have the same sort of disputes over methodology as two-year schools, such as how to factor in the part-time student.
Universities tend to have a different mission than community colleges, with less developmental education and vocational training, just to name a couple of distinctions. Nevertheless it's instructive when universities are compared to each other.
Lynn O'Shaughnessy of CBS News recently posted an article on her blog, listing the "25 Universities with the Worst Graduation Rates." It was a follow-up to a previous post, which can also be accessed at the site. She selects data on graduation in four years.
Here's the list, based on federal IPEDS data:
Great Basin College, NV 0%
Institute of Amer. Indian & Alaska Native Culture, NM 0%
Oklahoma State University Inst. of Technology, Okmulgee 0%
San Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 0%
Texas A&M University, Commerce 0%
Texas A&M International University, Laredo 0%
Alabama State University, Montgomery 0%
Macon State College, Macon, GA 0%
Dalton State College, Dover, DE 0%
Delaware State College, Dover 0%
Harris-Stowe State University, St. Louis 0%
Southern University at New Orleans 0%
Louisiana State University, Shreveport 0%
Haskell Indian Nations University, Lawrence, KS 1%
Oglala Lakota College, Kyle, SD 2%
University of Houston-Downtown, TX 2%
Purdue University-North Central Campus, Westville, IN 3%
Nevada State College, Henderson 3%
Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago 3%
University of the District of Columbia 3%
Chicago State University, IL 3%
University of Texas at Brownsville 3%
West Virginia University, Parkersburg 3%
University of Texas at El Paso 4%
Sul Ross State University, Alpine, TX 4%
For an introduction to the world of IPEDS, please see this previous post. The agency's methodology is loopy according to many, but let's put that argument aside for now.
As for the Texas schools on the list, Ms. O'Shaughnessy, says:
I pulled these schools from the federal education database called IPEDS. In sharing the names, I'd be remiss if I didn't give a special shout-out to the state of Texas. The Lone Star State managed to get seven of its state universities on this list! Clearly Texas is doing something wrong.
Let's also put this particular comment aside for a moment. Please read her entire article, because she makes some salient points about the reasons for low scores, with a pertinent response from an educator at Texas A&M–Commerce.
Now, what do all the schools on the "worst" list have in common? First of all, the 0% rates are possible statistically because of part-time students. In fact one can surmise that, based on this list, if you have more part-timers you suffer.
Also it is safe to say that the schools on the list are not highly selective in terms of SAT scores, high school GPA, and such. This is to their credit, of course, as these institutions allow more students an opportunity to receive an education.
Students at these schools probably tend to commute, although there may be some exceptions.
Finally, it's also a good guess that these schools are in low-income areas, filled with parents who have never set foot on a college campus. Hence these schools likely have large enrollments in developmental education.
Your probably know where this is headed. If you take the profile of the "worst" universities, you have a typical community college. Also, it is worth noting that the rates apparently have little to do with pedagogy, funding formulas, or most educational topics we argue about.
The author notes, "Compare those [rates] with the freshmen retention rates at such top schools as Princeton (98%) and UCLA (97%)."
So, want to improve your rates? Require students to attend full time, live in dorms, score higher on the SAT, and choose better educated and more affluent parents. Mission accomplished!